Had Enough?
I've have long passed my breaking point with the Bush Administration (and the Republican leadership and right-wing pundit class that enables this President). Although the faith in my party has been shaken severely, there have been some rational voices that were speaking out against President Bush and this Administration's insane policies from the very beginning... these include Bob Barr, Bruce Bartlett, Pat Buchanan, and a few others.

Lately however, with the incredible failure in Iraq looming large, many conservative heavyweights are attempting to put President Bush at arm's length... albeit without acknowledging that it wasn't so much that the policies that President Bush embraces are bad, but only the Bush Administration's implementation of the policies is flawed. For example, William F. Buckley writes:

"One can't doubt that the American objective in Iraq has failed."

But the failure wasn't because the cause itself wasn't "reasonable" as Mr. Buckley puts it (the cause he is referring to is conveniently not ridding Saddam of his mythical WMDs), but it was just that President Bush and his staff weren't up to the task of democratizing the stubborn Iraqis who would not "suspend internal divisions in order to get on with life in a political structure that guaranteed them religious freedom." Yes, if only the Iraqis had bought into the vision of democracy at gunpoint! I guess when your family members are being blown apart and tortured by an occupying army, you kind of lose sight of the "reasonable postulates" to which Mr. Buckley alludes. Yes, their bad Bill. Not surprisingly, Mr. Buckley is now arguing for an armed intervention in Iran and wondering aloud:

"Is [military intervention] something Mr. Bush is going to handle before the end of his term in office?"

Brilliant, Bill... just brilliant. You have learned nothing.

I was reading some news just now and stumbled on an article in TIME magazine posted today. It gave me just a wee bit of hope (but it's still early):

Republicans On The Run

[...]

As the campaign season kicks into gear, Republican incumbents are having a hard time figuring out how close they want to be to the White House. Voters have plenty to take out on Republican candidates this year--ethics scandals, the G.O.P.'S failure to curb spending, the government's inept response to Hurricane Katrina, a confusing new prescription-drug program for seniors and, more than anything else, an unpopular President who is fighting an unpopular war. Iraq could make a vulnerability of the Republicans' greatest asset, the security issue.

The midterm contests in a President's second term are almost always treacherous, but this time around, Republicans thought it would be different. The 2006 elections, coming on top of their gains in 2002 and 2004, would make history and perhaps even cement a G.O.P. majority in Congress for a generation. George W. Bush's credibility on national security and the states' aggressive gerrymandering, they believed, had turned the vast majority of districts into fortresses for incumbents. But that's not turning out to be the case. In recent weeks, a startling realization has begun to take hold: if the elections were held today, top strategists of both parties say privately, the Republicans would probably lose the 15 seats they need to keep control of the House of Representatives and could come within a seat or two of losing the Senate as well. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, who masterminded the 1994 elections that brought Republicans to power on promises of revolutionizing the way Washington is run, told TIME that his party has so bungled the job of governing that the best campaign slogan for Democrats today could be boiled down to just two words: "Had enough?"

[...]

I know many of my blog faithful don't see eye-to-eye on me with respect to President Bush and his inept handling of our foreign policy (and don't get Bruce Bartlett started about how President Bush bankrupted America and betrayed the Reagan legacy... er, wait, nevermind, he already wrote a book about it) - but my question to you is this, when have you had enough?!

I made a friendly wager with my friend Dan that there would be U.S. soldiers in Tehran by November of 2008 and I fully expect to collect on that bet. If the U.S. populace writ large can swallow all of the lies the Bush Administration told about Iraq and not really blink an eye... President Bush was re-elected after all... then I don't see what is going to stop the Bush Administration (and his willing enablers) from committing US forces to an Iran invasion in order to mitigate would will be sold as a "grave and gathering threat" to US security. It really is nothing more than a matter of selling the same crap, just on a different day. The US public will buy it... again... hook, line, and sinker.

(Update Mon Mar 27 16:27:27 PST 2006 // fixed a spelling error)

Comments

Re: Had Enough? Although the faith in my party has been shaken severely, You mean you are a republican. Whoa...Dude!!! :: Comment posted by Mark on Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:22 [Respond to this comment]

Re: Had Enough I don't mind admitting I vote for Republicans the majority of the time as the Republican Pary has (historically at least) been more representative of my own personal views. I've voted for Democrats too... these include big ones like Al Gore and John Kerry. But even back when I lived in Utah, whoever was running against Orrin Hatch (one of the slimiest Senators in Washington DC... and that's saying something) got my vote by default. Up here in Washington State, I cast my vote for local Republican candidates more often than not (you guessed it, I voted against Nethercutt more than I voted for Murray). :: Comment posted by rus on Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:01 [Respond to this comment]